0Chris Brown performing in London (2023) (Lukas Gerronimo via Wikipedia Commons)
(TW: contains references to GBV)
The upcoming performance of R&B singer Chris Brown in South Africa this December has reignited a longstanding debate in the music industry – is music truly bigger than the individual artist? As controversy swirls on social media and petitions circulate to prevent Brown’s performance, the public is grappling with the complex question of whether art can be separated from the artist.
While it’s acknowledged that no public figure is without flaws, some controversies prove more challenging to overlook than others. Brown’s history of violence, particularly against women, is well-documented and deeply troubling. As detailed by Rolling Stone, Brown has faced multiple legal issues related to violence and sexual assault over the years. His 2009 assault on then-girlfriend Rihanna shocked the world, and subsequent allegations have only added to his controversial reputation.
In a country like South Africa, where gender-based violence (GBV) is a critical issue, inviting such a controversial figure takes on added significance. According to Statistics South Africa, in 2016/17 alone, sexual offence in particular stands out with 68.5% of the victims being women, with many experts believing the actual numbers to be much higher due to underreporting. Given these statistics, it’s understandable why many are calling for a boycott of Brown’s concert.
Now, some fans argue that boycotting the concert won’t magically solve South Africa’s ongoing crisis of GBV. They’ve got a point – one cancelled show isn’t going to erase years of systemic issues. But by giving Brown a platform, aren’t we sending a message that his actions are forgivable, or worse, forgettable? It’s a tricky balance.
“…one cancelled show isn’t going to erase years of systemic issues.”
History shows us that while scandals may dominate headlines in the short term, it’s often the art that endures. Take, for example, Jean-Baptiste Lully, a 17th-century composer who was notorious in his time for his temper and personal scandals. Today, he’s primarily remembered as a master of French Baroque music, with his personal controversies largely forgotten by the general public. This isn’t to say we should ignore or excuse Brown’s actions. Holding celebrities accountable is crucial, especially in an age where they wield significant influence over popular culture. ‘
Many Twitter users took to the platform to mention how Chris Brown has already paid for his crimes by serving time and through rehabilitation via community service, and that they’re rather excited to attend his concert. Even singer Kelly Rowland, who defended Brown at the 2022 American Music Awards, called for “grace” and “forgiveness” to be extended to him.
While some argue that Brown has faced legal consequences and shown remorse, others contend that his continued success in the industry sends a problematic message about the seriousness with which we treat violence against women. The music industry itself faces a reckoning. Concert promoters and venue operators must weigh financial opportunities against ethical considerations, while radio stations and streaming platforms deal with a similar quandary. The situation becomes more complex when considering the economic impact on local businesses, event staff, and the entertainment sector that benefits from such high-profile performances.
Perhaps the most constructive approach is to redirect this controversy toward meaningful action. Rather than simply cancelling the concert or ignoring the concerns entirely, stakeholders could explore ways to use this platform constructively. This might include requiring that a portion of concert proceeds go toward organizations fighting GBV in South Africa, or using the event to raise awareness about domestic violence prevention and support services.
“Holding celebrities accountable is crucial, especially in an age where they wield significant influence over popular culture.”
While there may be no perfect solution to this dilemma, the conversation itself is valuable, forcing us to confront uncomfortable questions about accountability, redemption, and the role of art in society. Ultimately, each fan must make their own decision about whether they can separate Brown’s music from his actions. Whatever the outcome, the debate has already succeeded in one crucial aspect; keeping the conversation about GBV at the forefront of public consciousness, where it belongs.
If you have been affected by issues in this article, you can call the Refuge domestic violence hotline at 0808 2000 247
Is music bigger than the individual?
(TW: contains references to GBV)
The upcoming performance of R&B singer Chris Brown in South Africa this December has reignited a longstanding debate in the music industry – is music truly bigger than the individual artist? As controversy swirls on social media and petitions circulate to prevent Brown’s performance, the public is grappling with the complex question of whether art can be separated from the artist.
While it’s acknowledged that no public figure is without flaws, some controversies prove more challenging to overlook than others. Brown’s history of violence, particularly against women, is well-documented and deeply troubling. As detailed by Rolling Stone, Brown has faced multiple legal issues related to violence and sexual assault over the years. His 2009 assault on then-girlfriend Rihanna shocked the world, and subsequent allegations have only added to his controversial reputation.
In a country like South Africa, where gender-based violence (GBV) is a critical issue, inviting such a controversial figure takes on added significance. According to Statistics South Africa, in 2016/17 alone, sexual offence in particular stands out with 68.5% of the victims being women, with many experts believing the actual numbers to be much higher due to underreporting. Given these statistics, it’s understandable why many are calling for a boycott of Brown’s concert.
Now, some fans argue that boycotting the concert won’t magically solve South Africa’s ongoing crisis of GBV. They’ve got a point – one cancelled show isn’t going to erase years of systemic issues. But by giving Brown a platform, aren’t we sending a message that his actions are forgivable, or worse, forgettable? It’s a tricky balance.
History shows us that while scandals may dominate headlines in the short term, it’s often the art that endures. Take, for example, Jean-Baptiste Lully, a 17th-century composer who was notorious in his time for his temper and personal scandals. Today, he’s primarily remembered as a master of French Baroque music, with his personal controversies largely forgotten by the general public. This isn’t to say we should ignore or excuse Brown’s actions. Holding celebrities accountable is crucial, especially in an age where they wield significant influence over popular culture. ‘
Many Twitter users took to the platform to mention how Chris Brown has already paid for his crimes by serving time and through rehabilitation via community service, and that they’re rather excited to attend his concert. Even singer Kelly Rowland, who defended Brown at the 2022 American Music Awards, called for “grace” and “forgiveness” to be extended to him.
While some argue that Brown has faced legal consequences and shown remorse, others contend that his continued success in the industry sends a problematic message about the seriousness with which we treat violence against women. The music industry itself faces a reckoning. Concert promoters and venue operators must weigh financial opportunities against ethical considerations, while radio stations and streaming platforms deal with a similar quandary. The situation becomes more complex when considering the economic impact on local businesses, event staff, and the entertainment sector that benefits from such high-profile performances.
Perhaps the most constructive approach is to redirect this controversy toward meaningful action. Rather than simply cancelling the concert or ignoring the concerns entirely, stakeholders could explore ways to use this platform constructively. This might include requiring that a portion of concert proceeds go toward organizations fighting GBV in South Africa, or using the event to raise awareness about domestic violence prevention and support services.
While there may be no perfect solution to this dilemma, the conversation itself is valuable, forcing us to confront uncomfortable questions about accountability, redemption, and the role of art in society. Ultimately, each fan must make their own decision about whether they can separate Brown’s music from his actions. Whatever the outcome, the debate has already succeeded in one crucial aspect; keeping the conversation about GBV at the forefront of public consciousness, where it belongs.
If you have been affected by issues in this article, you can call the Refuge domestic violence hotline at 0808 2000 247
Sanjiti Banerjee
The contentious fate of Exeter’s old Bus Station
Unpaid internships: opportunities for the privileged, exploitation for the rest
You may also like
Subscribe to our newsletter